1/29/2024 0 Comments The stamp act and true storys![]() ![]() As a direct tax, it appeared to be an unconstitutional measure, one that deprived freeborn British citizens of the rights and privileges they enjoyed as British subjects, including the right to representation. Colonial Protest: Gentry, Merchants, and the Stamp Act Congressįor many British colonists living in America, the Stamp Act raised serious civil liberties concerns. When 1500 troops arrived in New York in 1766, the New York Assembly refused to follow the Quartering Act. Widespread disregard for the law occurred in almost all the colonies, but the issue was especially contentious in New York, the headquarters of the British forces. Since the time of King James II (1685 -1688) many British subjects had mistrusted the presence of a standing army during peacetime, and having to pay for the soldiers’ lodging and food was especially burdensome. In addition, the costs of the troops’ food and lodging fell to the colonists. It required that they be provided with barracks or places to stay in public houses and that if extra housing were necessary, then troops could be stationed in barns and other uninhabited private buildings. The Quartering Act of 1765 addressed the problem of housing British soldiers stationed in the American colonies. Parliament also asserted its colonial authority in 1765 with the Quartering Act. You can view the transcript for “The Stamp Act” here (opens in new window). This video highlights the reasoning for the Stamp Act and the colonial reactions to it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |